EU AI Act Art. 17: quality management system

Quality management system

From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 17 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 17ClauseEU AI ActArt. 17Duty holder: ProviderDuty holderProviderApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02DeferredArtefact: QMS-as-code; versioned policies; pipeline controls and change managementArtefactQMS-as-codeLayers: Layer 01 Govern-as-Code and Layer 05 Assurance & Continuous ComplianceLayersLayer 01Layer 05Evidence record: Go/no-go decision, Policy card, Evidence record, Control observationEvidence recordGo/no-godecision+3 moreSame topic in 20 frameworks (37 clauses): ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, TC260 Framework 3.0, China GenAI Measures, China Algo.Rec., China Deep Synthesis, GDPR and 13 moreAs of 2026-09-24 · illustrative, not a claim of conformity From clause to evidenceThe chain from EU AI Act Art. 17 to its evidence record, in 6 steps; the text alternative lists them and the facts under the figure state each in full.Clause: EU AI Act (post-Omnibus), Art. 17ClauseEU AI Act · Art. 17Duty holder: ProviderDuty holderProviderApplies from: 2027-12-02 (Deferred)Applies from2027-12-02 · DeferredArtefact: QMS-as-code; versioned policies; pipeline controls and change managementArtefactQMS-as-codeLayers: Layer 01 Govern-as-Code and Layer 05 Assurance & Continuous ComplianceLayersLayer 01Layer 05Evidence record: Go/no-go decision, Policy card, Evidence record, Control observationEvidence recordGo/no-go decision · +3 moreSame topic in 20 frameworks (37 clauses):ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, TC260 Framework 3.0,China GenAI Measures, China Algo. Rec. and…As of 2026-09-24illustrative, not a claim of conformity
From clause to evidence Build the artefact, then file every output it produces as a record that names AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
  • Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 17.
  • Duty holder: Provider.
  • Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
  • Artefact: QMS-as-code.
  • Layers: Layer 01, Layer 05.
  • Evidence record: Go/no-go decision, +3 more.
  • Record schemas: Go/no-go decision , Policy card , Evidence record , Control observation .
  • The same topic in 20 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk(Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use bypublic authorities (Art.111(2))2027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register(chapter 08)
When this obligation applies3 dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17 on a time axis, against its review date 2026-09-24.2027-12-02 · DeferredAnnex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded(product safety-component)systems2030-08-02 · Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risksystems intended for use by publicauthorities (Art. 111(2))2024202620282030As of 2026-09-242027-12-02 · Deferred · Annex III2028-08-02 · High-risk (Annex I) · Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems2030-08-02 · Later step · Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))Source: Obligation register (chapter 08)
When this obligation applies The first date in the row's status, then each later step: filled once its date has passed, outlined while it is still ahead of the review date.
Data table: the dates
Dates of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17
DateStepDetail
2027-12-02DeferredAnnex III
2028-08-02High-risk (Annex I)Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
2030-08-02Later stepDeadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17
Instrument
EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
Compared side by side
ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Clause
Art. 17
Duty holder
Provider
Authority
National MSA
Applies from
Deferred · Annex III
Later dates
  • Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
  • Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
System class
High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)

The artefact that evidences it

QMS-as-code; versioned policies; pipeline controls and change management.

What this obligation connects toEU AI Act Art. 17 and its 24 relations: 1 patterns, 3 open controls, 20 same crosswalk topic.DirectColour: stack layer of the pattern or control05 AssuranceEU AI Act Art. 17Patterns (1)Machine-Readable Evidence (OSCAL) · DirectMachine-Readable EvidenceOpen controls (3)AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-004 Common Signed Evidence Record · DirectCommon Signed Evidence…AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-006 Control Observations Filed Against Control Ids · DirectControl Observations Filed…AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-007 Machine-Readable Evidence in OSCAL · DirectMachine-Readable Evidence…Same crosswalk topic (20)AI Verify 9.1.1, 9.5.2 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM GRC-01, GRC-06 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7 · Core clauseChina Algo. Rec.China Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 7 · Core clauseChina Deep SynthesisChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 9 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresGAO AI Accountability 1.2, 1.1, 1.3 · Core clauseGAO AI Accountability+14 more+14 more: GDPR Art. 5(2), ISO 42001 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, A.2, A.3, 9.3, 7.2, 9.2, 10.1, NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1, GOVERN 2, GOVERN 4, GOVERN 5, OECD AI Principles OECD 1.5, Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.2.1, Singapore GenAI GenAI 1, TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 4, TC260 5.3.12, UK ATRS ATRS 2.1, CoE Convention CoE Art. 9, EN 18286 EN 18286, EU AI Act Art. 4, Art. 87, G7 Code G7 Action 5, GPAI Code Safety C8, Korea AI Act Art. 36
What this obligation connects toEU AI Act Art. 17 and its 24 relations: 1 patterns, 3 open controls, 20 same crosswalk topic.DirectColour: stack layer of the pattern or control05 AssurancePatterns (1)Machine-Readable Evidence (OSCAL) · DirectMachine-Readable EvidenceSame crosswalk topic (20)AI Verify 9.1.1, 9.5.2 · Core clauseAI VerifyCSA AICM GRC-01, GRC-06 · Core clauseCSA AICMChina Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7 · Core clauseChina Algo. Rec.China Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 7 · Core clauseChina Deep SynthesisChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 9 · Core clauseChina GenAI MeasuresGAO AI Accountability 1.2, 1.1, 1.3 · Core clauseGAO AI Accountability+14 more+14 more: GDPR Art. 5(2), ISO 42001 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, A.2, A.3, 9.3, 7.2, 9.2, 10.1, NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1, GOVERN 2, GOVERN 4, GOVERN 5, OECD AI Principles OECD 1.5, Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.2.1, Singapore GenAI GenAI 1, TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 4, TC260 5.3.12, UK ATRS ATRS 2.1, CoE Convention CoE Art. 9, EN 18286 EN 18286, EU AI Act Art. 4, Art. 87, G7 Code G7 Action 5, GPAI Code Safety C8, Korea AI Act Art. 36Open controls (3)AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-004 Common Signed Evidence Record · DirectCommon Signed Evidence…AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-006 Control Observations Filed Against Control Ids · DirectControl Observations Filed…AIGE-CTL-ASSURE-007 Machine-Readable Evidence in OSCAL · DirectMachine-Readable Evidence…EU AI Act Art. 17
What this obligation connects to Solid edges are direct relations, dashed ones looser (a case that cites the same article, a framework whose clauses only touch the topic); patterns and controls take the colour of their stack layer. Select a node to open it; the lists below give every relation in full.
Data table: every relation
Relations of AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17
FamilyItemRelation
PatternsMachine-Readable Evidence (OSCAL)Direct
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-ASSURE-004 Common Signed Evidence RecordDirect
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-ASSURE-006 Control Observations Filed Against Control IdsDirect
Open controlsAIGE-CTL-ASSURE-007 Machine-Readable Evidence in OSCALDirect
Same crosswalk topicAI Verify 9.1.1, 9.5.2Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCSA AICM GRC-01, GRC-06Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina Deep Synthesis DeepSyn Art. 7Core clause
Same crosswalk topicChina GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 9Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGAO AI Accountability 1.2, 1.1, 1.3Core clause
Same crosswalk topicGDPR Art. 5(2)Core clause
Same crosswalk topicISO 42001 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, A.2, A.3, 9.3, 7.2, 9.2, 10.1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicNIST AI RMF GOVERN 1, GOVERN 2, GOVERN 4, GOVERN 5Core clause
Same crosswalk topicOECD AI Principles OECD 1.5Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore Agentic Agentic 2.2.1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicSingapore GenAI GenAI 1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicTC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 4, TC260 5.3.12Core clause
Same crosswalk topicUK ATRS ATRS 2.1Core clause
Same crosswalk topicCoE Convention CoE Art. 9Related clause
Same crosswalk topicEN 18286 EN 18286Related clause
Same crosswalk topicEU AI Act Art. 4, Art. 87Related clause
Same crosswalk topicG7 Code G7 Action 5Related clause
Same crosswalk topicGPAI Code Safety C8Related clause
Same crosswalk topicKorea AI Act Art. 36Related clause

Patterns that build it

The same topic in other frameworks

From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.

Governance and accountability

Open controls that evidence it

Draft controls in the open control profiles that map to this row: each states a requirement and the evidence it must leave behind.

Source

Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.

Machine-readable

Cite this obligation

García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 17: quality management system (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art17. CC BY 4.0

BibTeX

@misc{aige2026obligation,
  author       = {Jorge García Aibar},
  title        = {{EU AI Act Art. 17: quality management system (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART17)}},
  howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
  year         = {2026},
  version      = {0.5.0},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
  url          = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art17},
  note         = {Version 0.5.0}
}