EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting
Serious-incident reporting for high-risk systems, on the deadlines of chapter 08's reporting-clock table
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73. Drawn from chapter 08.
Text alternative
- Clause: EU AI Act, Art. 73.
- Duty holder: Provider.
- Applies from: 2027-12-02, Deferred.
- Artefact: Incident detection and triage….
- Layers: Layer 05, Layer 04.
- Evidence record: AI incident record.
- Record schemas: AI incident record .
- The same topic in 15 other frameworks; the crosswalk section below links each clause.
Data table: the dates
| Date | Step | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 2027-12-02 | Deferred | Annex III |
| 2028-08-02 | High-risk (Annex I) | Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems |
| 2030-08-02 | Later step | Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2)) |
- Id
AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73- Instrument
- EU AI Act (post-Omnibus) law
- Compared side by side
- ISO 42001 vs EU AI Act · NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
- Clause
- Art. 73
- Duty holder
- Provider
- Authority
- National MSA
- Applies from
- Deferred · Annex III
- Later dates
-
- Applies to Annex I embedded (product safety-component) systems
- Deadline for legacy high-risk systems intended for use by public authorities (Art. 111(2))
- System class
- High-risk (Annex III) · High-risk (Annex I)
The artefact that evidences it
Incident detection and triage pipeline; reporting-clock automation; evidence capture.
Data table: every relation
| Family | Item | Relation |
|---|---|---|
| Patterns | Incident Pipeline | Direct |
| Open controls | AIGE-CTL-EVAL-007 Incident Evidence Preservation | Direct |
| Open controls | AIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-011 Serious incident reporting clocks | Direct |
| Same crosswalk topic | AI Verify 9.5.4, 1.5.1, 1.6.1, 5.11.1 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | CSA AICM SEF-07, SEF-08 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | China GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 14, GenAI Art. 15 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | EU AI Act Art. 72, Art. 26(5), Art. 55, Art. 3(49), Art. 20 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | G7 Code G7 Action 2, G7 Action 4 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | GAO AI Accountability 4.1, 4.2 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | GDPR Arts. 33–34 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | GPAI Code Safety C9, Safety 3.5 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | ISO 42001 A.8, 10.2 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | Korea AI Act Art. 32(1) | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4, MANAGE 4.3, MANAGE 2.4, GOVERN 4.3 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.3.3 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | Singapore GenAI GenAI 4 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.7, TC260 5.3.18, TC260 App. 2 II.6 | Core clause |
| Same crosswalk topic | China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7 | Related clause |
Patterns that build it
- Incident Pipeline (layer 5)
The same topic in other frameworks
From the topic crosswalk: the clauses filed under the same topics as this one. Mappings are illustrative, not a claim of conformity.
Incident response and monitoring
- EU AI Act Art. 72 Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan (core)
- ISO 42001 A.8 Information for interested parties (core)
- ISO 42001 10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action (core)
- NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4 MANAGE 4: Risk treatments, including response and recovery, and communication plans for the identified and measured AI risks are documented and monitored (core)
- TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.7 Real-time risk monitoring (core)
- TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 5.3.18 Incident reporting (core)
- China GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 14 Handle and report unlawful content (core)
- China GenAI Measures GenAI Art. 15 Complaint and reporting mechanism (core)
- EU AI Act Art. 26(5) Deployer monitoring, informing the provider and suspending use (core)
- GPAI Code Safety C9 Commitment 9: Serious incident reporting (core)
- GDPR Arts. 33–34 Notification and communication of a personal data breach (core)
- NIST AI RMF MANAGE 4.3 MANAGE 4.3: Incidents and errors are communicated to relevant AI actors, including affected communities. Processes for tracking, responding to, and recovering from incidents and errors are followed and documented (core)
- CSA AICM SEF-07 Incident Management and Response (core)
- CSA AICM SEF-08 Security Breach Notification (core)
- Korea AI Act Art. 32(1) Safety duties for AI above the compute threshold (core)
- Singapore GenAI GenAI 4 Incident Reporting (core)
- Singapore Agentic Agentic 2.3.3 When deploying, continuously monitor and test (core)
- G7 Code G7 Action 2 Identify and mitigate vulnerabilities, incidents and misuse after deployment (core)
- G7 Code G7 Action 4 Responsible information sharing and reporting of incidents (core)
- GAO AI Accountability 4.1 Planning: develop plans for continuous or routine monitoring of the AI system (core)
- GAO AI Accountability 4.2 Drift: establish the range of data and model drift that is acceptable (core)
- AI Verify 9.5.4 Accountability: enable an incident management process to report and respond to actions or decisions that affect the AI system's outcome (core)
- AI Verify 1.5.1 Transparency: communicate to end users whenever an incident has occurred (core)
- EU AI Act Art. 55 Obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk
- TC260 Framework 3.0 TC260 App. 2 II.6 Emergency plans
- China Algo. Rec. AlgoRec Art. 7 Security management and emergency response
- EU AI Act Art. 3(49) Definition of serious incident
- EU AI Act Art. 20 Corrective actions and duty of information
- GPAI Code Safety 3.5 Measure 3.5: Post-market monitoring
- NIST AI RMF MANAGE 2.4 MANAGE 2.4: Mechanisms are in place and applied, and responsibilities are assigned and understood, to supersede, disengage, or deactivate AI systems that demonstrate performance or outcomes inconsistent with intended use
- NIST AI RMF GOVERN 4.3 GOVERN 4.3: Organizational practices are in place to enable AI testing, identification of incidents, and information sharing
- AI Verify 1.6.1 Transparency: give end users and external parties the means to report adverse impacts, with whistleblower protection
- AI Verify 5.11.1 Security: monitor AI system outputs and behaviour after deployment and alert system owners to issues
Open controls that evidence it
Draft controls in the open control profiles that map to this row: each states a requirement and the evidence it must leave behind.
-
AIGE-CTL-EVAL-007Incident Evidence Preservation (Evaluation environment profile) -
AIGE-CTL-DEPLOY-011Serious incident reporting clocks (Deployment and monitoring profile)
Source
Chapter 08, section EU AI Act, post-Omnibus, checked against its sources on the review date above.
Machine-readable
- This obligation:
/api/v1/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73.json - The register:
/api/v1/obligations.json· CSV - Schema and stability promise: open data and API
Cite this obligation
García Aibar, J. (2026). EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73). In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis & Body of Knowledge (v0.5.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22956197. https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73. CC BY 4.0
BibTeX
@misc{aige2026obligation,
author = {Jorge García Aibar},
title = {{EU AI Act Art. 73: serious-incident reporting (AIGE-OBL-EUAIA-ART73)}},
howpublished = {In AI Governance Engineering: The Thesis \& Body of Knowledge},
year = {2026},
version = {0.5.0},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.22956197},
url = {https://aigovernanceengineer.com/obligations/aige-obl-euaia-art73},
note = {Version 0.5.0}
}